Stanley v. Tucker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William R. Moller, Edmund T. Curran, Regnier, Moller & Taylor, a Partnership, John Does, A, B, C, and D, Defendants-appellees, 445 F.2d 1400 (2d Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseDecided April 9, 1971
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Judge.
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se.
Peter C. Schwartz, Hartford, Conn. (Gordon, Muir & Fitzgerald, Hartford, Conn.), for defendants-appellees.
Before MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, appeals from dismissal by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Judge, (D. Conn. 1970) of his civil action against attorneys representing opposing parties in actions attacking the constitutionality of Connecticut attachment statutes. We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld below, for lack of action "under color of state law" to base claims under the civil rights statutes.
Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
