United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Mitchell Darryl Snyder, Appellant, 444 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, Judge.
Gerald M. Singer (argued), Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellant.
Paul Flynn, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
In this Dyer Act case, we find sufficient evidence of joint venture in the possessing and transporting of the automobile to uphold Snyder's conviction.
Judge Hufstedler dissents upon the ground that the evidence is patently inadequate to support the implied finding of joint venture.
Bruce R. Thompson, judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
