National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Itt Henze Valve Service, Controls and Instrument Division, International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation, Respondent, 435 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1971)
Annotate this CaseApplication for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Florida Case).
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Harold A. Boire, Director, N. L. R. B., Tampa, Fla., Marjorie S. Gofreed, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
George C. Longshore, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO.
Clyde N. Wells, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Although the proof was not overwhelming, we conclude that there was substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's findings: that the respondent did not bargain in good faith with the Union, in violation of Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act; that the strike which occurred on April 27, 1966, was caused by unfair labor practices, as defined by the Act; that the respondent instituted a work rule change without notice to the Union for the purpose of discouraging Union activity, and in violation of Section 8(a) (5), (3) and (1) of the Act; that the respondent interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the Act; that the respondent terminated and refused to reinstate unfair labor practice strikers in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act; and that, therefore, the order of the Board will be enforced.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
