Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent, 415 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CasePetition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case).
Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, Alan E. Harazin, Cincinnati, Ohio, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of this cause en banc the Court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the majority of the panel be and the same is hereby affirmed, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1006.
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, BELL, AINSWORTH, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, dissent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
