United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Gregorio Victor Villahermosa, Defendant-appellant, 411 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseConrad Walker, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Edwin L. Miller, Jr., U. S. Atty., Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge* .
PER CURIAM:
Defendant's sole point on appeal from his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 173 is that the trial court improperly permitted the use of evidence of defendant's prior convictions for impeachment. Defendant relies upon the line of cases following Luck v. United States, 121 U.S.App. D.C. 151, 348 F.2d 763 (1965). Since no objection was made to the evidence, its use was not reversible error. Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 365 F.2d 949, 951 (1966).
Affirmed.
Honorable Charles L. Powell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
