Nina Raass, Appellant, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Appellee, 404 F.2d 937 (9th Cir. 1969)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition to Review an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Milton T. Simmons and Donald L. Ungar, of Phelan, Simmons & Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., David R. Urdan, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen Suffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel, San Pedro, Calif., Ramsey Clark, Atty. Gen. of U. S., Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The identical issue here presented, upon substantially identical facts, was dealt with by this court in Bloomfield v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 404 F.2d 656 [Dec. 19, 1968].
Upon the authority of that opinion the order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service denying application for change of status is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
