Ruscon Construction Corporation, Appellant, v. Acrow Carolina, Inc., Appellee, 402 F.2d 989 (4th Cir. 1968)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 4, 1968
T. E. Pedersen, Charleston, S. C., for appellant.
J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N. C. (Fleming, Robinson & Bradshaw, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The issues which arose in this case between a general contractor and his subcontractor are chiefly factual. There was conflict in the evidence which the District Judge resolved in a manner substantially supported in the record. We cannot say that his findings are clearly erroneous, and we find no error in the interpretation of the contract between the parties or other error of law.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
