Denis v. Del Giudice, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 396 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968) June 5, 1968

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles H. Carr, District Judge.

Luke McKissack, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

William M. Byrne, Jr., U. S. Atty., Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Criminal Division, Gabriel A. Gutterrez, Asst. U. S. Atty., Arthur A. Dickerman, Dept. of Health, Education & Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant stands convicted of sale (and possession for sale) of LSD-25 in violation of the 1965 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The sole question on appeal is the constitutionality of that Act with which question we have dealt in our opinion in Deyo v. United States, 9 Cir., 396 F.2d 595, filed this day. For the reasons there set forth, judgment is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.