Arnold Oglesby and Virginia E. Oglesby, Appellants, v. Ralston Purina Company, Appellee, 385 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseL. D. Skaggs, Athens, Ga., for appellants.
Julius M. Hulsey, Gainesville, Ga., Kenyon & Gunter, Gainesville, Ga., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, BELL and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The District Court directed a verdict for appellee in a suit for the balance due on a contract whereunder feed was sold to appellants and turkeys were either sold to or financed for appellants. We find the errors assigned to be without merit. Specifically, the construction of the contract by the court with respect to feed prices was not erroneous nor did the court err in excluding the proferred hearsay testimony and documentary evidence relating to the condition of the turkeys.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
