Aircraftsmen, Inc., Appellant, v. Aircraft Equipment Company, Appellee, 383 F.2d 988 (5th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; William O. Mehrtens, Judge.
William E. Schuyler, Jr., Washington, D. C., Richard A. Pallot, Miami, Fla., (Pallot, Silver, Pallot & Stern, Miami, Fla., Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.
James E. Cockfield, Washington, D. C., Thomas H. Anderson, Miami, Fla., (James P. Burns, Burns, Doane, Benedict, Swecker & Mathis, Washington, D. C., Shutts & Bowen, Miami, Fla., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal by the plaintiff below is from a judgment holding United States Letters Patent 2,828,166 invalid and not to have been infringed by defendant-appellee. All issues of law and fact were exhaustively considered and decided by the District Court in a published opinion, 247 F. Supp. 469 (1965). Upon thorough consideration of the appeal, including briefs and fine arguments here, we are left in no doubt that the case was correctly decided. This being so, no worthwhile service is to be accomplished by any paraphrasing of an opinion already published.
The judgment of the District Court, therefore, is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
