Mary M. Kelly and Leo Kelly, Appellants, v. Edwin Chillag and Holden Hospital, Inc., a Corporation, Appellees, 381 F.2d 344 (4th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseRudolph L. Di Trapano, Charleston, W. Va. (Thomas P. Maroney, and Di Trapano & Mitchell, on brief), for appellants.
Wilson Anderson, Charleston, W. Va. (Carl F. Stucky, Jr., and Steptoe & Johnson, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit judges.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment entered in her favor in her action for malpractice against a surgeon. Her principal complaint is the withdrawal from the jury of the question of punitive damages.
However censurable the physician's lack of candor after the event, it cannot convert his act of simple negligence into one of such recklessness or wilfulness as to furnish a foundation for punitive damages.
Otherwise, we also find the court's submission of the case to the jury fair and in conformity with the governing law of West Virginia.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
