Donald Wray Spears, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 370 F.2d 335 (9th Cir. 1967)
Annotate this CaseMalcolm S. MacMillan, Concord, Cal., for appellant.
Manuel L. Real, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Edwin L. Miller, U. S. Atty., Phillip W. Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Alan D. Sirota, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This border crossing narcotics case is affirmed on the authority of Blackford v. United States, 9 Cir., 247 F.2d 745, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 914, 78 S. Ct. 672, 2 L. Ed. 2d 586.
The rectal probing and the circumstances thereof are quite similar to Blackford. It should be noted that the facts here are much stronger for the government than our recent case of Rivas v. United States, 9 Cir., 368 F.2d 703, decided November 8, 1966.
Judgment affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
