Tensitron, Inc., Appellant, v. David Bromley, D/b/a Electromatic Equipment Company, Appellee, 369 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 3, 1966
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; John F. Dooling, Jr., Judge.
Robert E. Burns, New York City (Burns, Lobato & Zelnick, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Lawrence F. Scinto, New York City (Ward, Haselton, McElhannon, Orme, Brooks & Fitzpatrick, New York City), for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm Judge Dooling's finding that Tensitron's tension meter was "obvious" within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore not patentable. His well reasoned opinion is reported at 260 F. Supp. 457 (1966). It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to pass upon his finding that Bromley's device infringed claims 2, 3, 5, and 6 of Tensitron's patent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
