David Conrad Collins, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 356 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1966)
Annotate this CaseJames M. Russ, Orlando, Fla., for appellant.
Robert B. McGowan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, for appellee.
Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Two questions are presented by this appeal. The first is that the arrest and the search and seizure following the arrest were unlawful and that the evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest and by virtue of the search was inadmissible. The second question is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. Both of the issues raised must be resolved against the appellant and his conviction sustained. The judgment and sentence of the district court are
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
