In the Matter of J. Jay Vandergrift.marjorie Holmes Vandergrift, Appellant, 341 F.2d 921 (3d Cir. 1965)
Annotate this CaseDecided March 4, 1965
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Joseph P. Willson, Judge.
Howard I. Scott and Kountz, Fry & Meyer, Pittsburgh, Pa. (A. E. Kountz, Lawrence B. Niemann, Tice F. Ryan, Jr., and Ryan, Newman Geer & Goldring, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Henry C. Herchenroether, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Alter, Wright & Barron, Pittsburgh, Pa., James F. McMullan, Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we find no error
The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated in the Opinion of Judge Wilson reported at 232 F. Supp. 857 (W.D. Pa. 1964).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
