Buford Waldroff, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 341 F.2d 378 (5th Cir. 1965)
Annotate this CaseS. Gunter Toney, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellant.
John W. Popper, Jr., Floyd M. Buford, U. S. Atty., Sampson M. Culpepper, Asst. U. S. Atty., Macon, Ga., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and MOORE* and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted of possessing, selling, and transporting non-tax-paid whiskey. He admitted the acts in question and relied on the defense of entrapment. This defense was submitted to the jury as a fact issue, and this necessarily included all questions relative to inducement and predisposition. The submission was proper under the evidence adduced, and there the matter ended. Hagans v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 315 F.2d 67, cert. den., 375 U.S. 826, 84 S. Ct. 68, 11 L. Ed. 2d 58.
Affirmed.
Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
