National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Ellenville Handle Works, Inc., Respondent, 331 F.2d 564 (2d Cir. 1964)
Annotate this CaseDecided May 4, 1964
Duane R. Batista, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.
Francis B. Conrad, New York City, for respondent.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
As the record amply supports the Board's decision which affirmed the Trial Examiner's Intermediate Report and adopted his findings and conclusions that the respondent had violated §§ 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., and his recommendation, with one amendment, 142 NLRB No. 92, and as the proposed order is in all respects appropriate, we grant enforcement of the Board's order
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
