Ples Elworth Russell, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 321 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1963)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 321 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1963) July 10, 1963

Ples Elworth Russell, in pro. per.

Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Thomas R. Sheridan, Russell R. Hermann, Asst. U. S. Attorneys, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Because of the broad allegations of knowing use of perjured testimony at his (Russell's) trial, it is our judgment that the district court's order denying relief must be reversed, and it is so ordered.

The government should be directed to respond to appellant's petition. Obviously appellant can be required to particularize his claim. Perhaps a deposition taken of appellant would show more clearly whether a hearing need be held, or, if held, whether there is any need for Russell's presence.

The remand is without limitation as to scope.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.