National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Samuel Cherico, Joseph Cherico, and Anthony Cherico, Doing Business As Clarion Fruit Company, Respondent, 313 F.2d 633 (3d Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 27, 1963
On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
James Harkless, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. General Counsel, Marcel, Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., on the brief), for petitioner.
Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we are of the opinion that the National Labor Relations Board has jurisdiction; that substantial evidence supports its findings that the respondents violated Section 8 (a) (1) and Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, and that the Board's Order is valid and proper.
For the reasons stated the Board's petition for enforcement will be granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
