United States of America, Appellee, v. Milton Holloway, Defendant-appellant, 311 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1963)
Annotate this CaseDecided January 23, 1963
Holloway appeals pro se from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward J. Dimock, J., denying, without hearing, his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, attacking a conviction for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 on the ground that the conviction was procured through evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure. Affirmed.
Milton Holloway, pro se, submitted.
Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., S. D. New York, William J. Quinlan, Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., submitted brief for appellee.
Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in open court Judge Dimock's denial of the petitioner's motion without hearing. The files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
