Arthur M. Harrison, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Pennsylvania Railroad, Defendant-appellee, 311 F.2d 224 (6th Cir. 1962)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 311 F.2d 224 (6th Cir. 1962) December 11, 1962

Appeal from the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Toledo.

Robert Dorrell, Toledo, Ohio (Reams, Bretherton & Neipp, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Carl V. Bruggeman, Toledo, Ohio (Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, John W. Hackett, Jr., Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.

This cause came on to be heard on the briefs, argument of counsel, and the full record in the case;

And it appearing after due consideration thereof that the action of the District Judge in granting defendant-appellee's motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff-appellant herein for failure to state a claim upon which the relief sought could be granted constitutes no reversible error;

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.