C. E. H. Mcdonnell, As Trustee in Reorganization of Equitable Plan Company, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bell Container Corporation and Harold J. Simon, Defendants-appellants, 310 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseDecided November 26, 1962
Osmond K. Fraenkel, New York City (Harold E. Horowitz and Samuel Wiener, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant Bell Container Corp.
Abraham Burstein, of Zelby & Burstein, New York City, for defendant-appellant Harold J. Simon.
Edward C. Kalaidjian, of Thacher, Proffitt, Prizer, Crawley & Wood, New York City (Robert S. Stitt, of Thacher, Proffitt, Prizer, Crawley & Wood, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, FRIENDLY, and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is a stockholder's derivative action seeking damages in behalf of Doeskin Products, Inc., resulting from a series of schemes to victimize it, which this court once before characterized as "a bold and outrageous corporate swindle," see McDonnell v. Tabah, 2 Cir., 297 F.2d 731, 732. We are now asked to hold that insufficient evidence existed to support Judge Palmieri's findings of participation by Bell Container Corporation in fraudulent transactions to supply containers and by Harold J. Simon in fraudulent transactions to supply trucking services to the milked corporation. The judge's extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law closely considered whether the various dealings of these two defendants with persons in fiduciary capacities to Doeskin were in furtherance of bona fide business purposes and decided they were not. Judge Palmieri's findings were justified by the evidence.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
