Mrs. Edna Latil Nichols, Appellant, v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Appellee, 310 F.2d 704 (5th Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseErwin A. LaRose, Arthur Cobb, Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.
Edward W. Gray, J. H. Percy, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., Percy, Macmurdo & Gray, Baton Rouge, La., for Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant having failed to object to the argument now contended to having been prejudicial, and no plain error or abdication of function by the District Judge appearing, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Reid, 5th Cir., 1935, 76 F.2d 30; Louisiana & Arkansas Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 5th Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 290, cert. den. 1954, 348 U.S. 875, 75 S. Ct. 111, 99 L. Ed. 688; Ford v. United Gas Corp., 5th Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 817, cert. den. 358 U.S. 824, 79 S. Ct. 40, 3 L. Ed. 2d 64.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
