Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, Nationallabor Relations Board, Appellant, v. the Greyhound Corporation, Appellee, 309 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseMarcel Mallet-Prevost, James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for appellant.
Warren E. Hall, Jr., Chesterfield H. Smith, Wofford H. Stidham, Bartow, Fla., for appellee.
Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga. (Wilson, Branch & Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel) as amicus curiae and on behalf of Floors, Inc.
I. J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (Zimrign, Gromfine & Sternstein, Washington, D.C., of counsel) as amicus curiae, and on behalf of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the district court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F. Supp. 686. We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
