Humble Oil & Refining Company, Appellant, v. Mabel W. Martin, Annie M. Kelly, Sue Kelly Mee, W. J. Vollor, Landman Teller, James P. Biedenharn, L. C. Gwin and R. D. Kuehnle, Appellees, 301 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1962)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Sidney C. Mize, Judge.
On Rehearing.
Rehearing Denied.
For former opinion, see 298 F.2d 163, which affirmed 199 F. Supp. 648.
M. M. Roberts, Joe A. Thompson, Hattiesburg, Miss., for appellant.
Landman Teller, Vicksburg, Miss., L. C. Gwin, Natchez, Miss., for appellees.
Before CAMERON and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Upon considering appellant's petition for rehearing and its amendment to or supplemental petition for rehearing and the briefs submitted with them, it is ordered and decreed that said petitions for rehearing, and each of them, are hereby
Denied.
THOMAS, District Judge (dissenting).
I am of the opinion there are absent indispensable parties. This would deprive this court of jurisdiction and leave the matter up to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, which I believe is the proper tribunal to decide this Mississippi question. Therefore I respectfully dissent.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
