Jay Alfred Ragusa, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 297 F.2d 525 (5th Cir. 1961)
Annotate this CaseJay A. Ragusa, in pro. per.
B. Euple Dozier, Asst. U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Alfred E. Moreton, III, Asst. U. S. Atty, Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.
It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
