William Wash Mcgehee, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 295 F.2d 430 (10th Cir. 1961)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 295 F.2d 430 (10th Cir. 1961) September 2, 1961

No appearance for appellant.

Harry G. Fender, Asst. U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl. (Edwin Langley, U. S. Atty., Muskogee, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PICKETT, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This is a proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 in which appellant sought to have sentences imposed after conviction upon informations for offenses arising under the Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113, set aside as denying him due process under the Fifth Amendment. Relief was denied by the trial court. The sole contention made is that the provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113 constitute but a single offense and that since Sec. 2113(e) carries the potential of a death sentence all accusations under the Act must be initiated by indictment. Rule 7(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S. C.A.

Appellant was specifically charged under Sec. 2113(a), (b), and (d). He waived indictment in open court, pleaded guilty to the charges relating to Sec. 2113 (a) and (b) and the charge under Sec. 2113(d) was dismissed.

In Young v. United States, 10 Cir., 1961, 294 F.2d 517, we held that Sec. 2113 was an aggregation of separate offenses, each subject to prosecution by information unless containing the elements set forth in Sec. 2113(e). Appellant was not charged under (e) and was not denied due process.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.