Thomas M. Angle v. Preston E. Rhoades and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually,jointly and Pearson& Mclaughlin, Erie, Pa., on Themyrtle Angle v. Preston E. Rhoades and Daisy A. Rhoades, Individually,jointly and Severally, Appellants v. Thomas M.angle, Third Party Defendant, 277 F.2d 925 (3d Cir. 1960)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit - 277 F.2d 925 (3d Cir. 1960) Argued May 6, 1960. Decided May 12, 1960

Bernard Quinn, Erie, Pa. (Quinn, Leemhuis, Plate & Dwyer, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

John G. Gent, William W. Knox, Erie, Pa. (Curtze & Gent, Erie, Pa., Harry F. Fleming, Detroit, Mich., Knox, Weber, Pearson & McLaughlin, Erie,Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Our examination of the record in this case discloses evidence sufficient to sustain the jury's verdict. We find no error in the conduct of the trial or the District Court's instructions to the jury.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.