Armour & Company, Libelant-appellee, v. Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero, S.a., Respondent-appellant, 263 F.2d 323 (2d Cir. 1959)
Annotate this CaseDecided February 4, 1959
Donald B. Allen, of Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, for respondent-appellant.
F. Herbert Prem, of Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for libelant-appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MOORE, Circuit Judge, and GIBSON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal respondent challenges only certain findings of fact of the trial court, made as a part of a reasoned opinion. Such findings may be upset only if clearly erroneous. F.R. 52 (a); McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S. Ct. 6, 99 L. Ed. 20; A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. The Exanthia, 2 Cir., 234 F.2d 650, 653; Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. The Saturnia, 2 Cir., 226 F.2d 147, 149; Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 2 Cir., 200 F.2d 908, 910. And we find each of them supported by ample evidence.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
