Guerrero-zapata Bridge Company, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee, 252 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1958)
Annotate this CaseRobert Lee Bobbitt, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., Bobbitt, Brite & Bobbitt, San Antonio, Tex., of counsel, for appellant.
Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, Elizabeth Dudley, Washington, D. C., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Malcolm R. Wilkey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before RIVES, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The question is whether for the taking of its bridge over the Rio Grande River, a toll bridge company is entitled to compensation on the basis of the land and improvements only or to the value of its franchise also. The Act of Congress authorizing the construction and operation of the bridge, approved March 29, 1928, 45 Stat. 387, expressly reserved "the right to alter, amend, or repeal this Act." The Bridge was inundated as the result of construction of a dam pursuant to a treaty of February 3, 1944 between the United States and Mexico, 59 Stat. 1219. In a well reasoned opinion, District Judge Allred has expressed the view that there was an implied repeal of the Act granting the franchise as clear and effective as an express repeal would have been, and that the bridge company was not due compensation for the value of its franchise, United States v. 85,237 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Zapata County, Texas, D.C., 157 F. Supp. 150. After careful consideration, we agree with that opinion.
The judgment is therefore
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
