Marcus Hackerman, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent, 229 F.2d 959 (6th Cir. 1955)
Annotate this CaseOn petition to review decision of Tax Court.
Llewellyn A. Luce, Washington, D. C., Theodore Hudson, Nashville, Tenn., for petitioner.
H. Brian Holland, R. P. Hertzog, Rollin H. Transue, Ellis N. Slack, George F. Lynch and Meyer Rothwacks, Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on a petition for review filed by the taxpayer; and due consideration having been given the oral arguments and briefs of both the taxpayer and the Commissioner and, likewise, the entire record in the cause;
The decision of the Tax Court holding that there are deficiencies as stated in the income tax of the petitioner for the years 1946 and 1947 is sustained, upon the basis of its findings of fact and for the reasons given in its opinion.
It is so ordered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
