Hammond v. Hammond, 198 F.2d 529 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- 198 F.2d 529 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
Argued March 17, 1952
Decided June 26, 1952
Decided June 26, 1952
James T, Wright, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
William L. Houston, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR, K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant's other contentions but find no error.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
