Woodson et al. v. Woodson, 191 F.2d 491 (D.C. Cir. 1951)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 191 F.2d 491 (D.C. Cir. 1951) Argued May 14, 1951
Decided July 5, 1951

J. Franklyn Bourne, Washington, D. C., with whom Curtis P. Mitchell, B. Dabney Fox and Frank D. Reeves, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Joseph H. Batt, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee.

Before CLARK, PROCTOR, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


This appeal is from a judgment by the District Court for absolute divorce. The question here is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the findings and judgment. We conclude that it is. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.