United States of America, Appellant, v. Frank Wallace and R. M. Makemson, Doing Business As Wallace and Wallace, a Partnership, Appellees, 185 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1950)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Dave W. Ling, Judge.
H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U. S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Fruit, Attorney, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., (Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., J. Gregory Bruce and John G. Roberts, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for appellant.
Evans, Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Norman S. Hull, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See United States v. Pacific Fruit and Produce Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 367, cf. Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 379.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
