Kasky v. Nike, Inc.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 5/22/02 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MARC KASKY, ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) NIKE, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants and Respondents. ) __________________________________ ) S087859 Ct.App. 1/1 A086142 San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 994446 MODIFICATION OF OPINION THE COURT: The majority opinion in this matter is modified as follows: In the second full paragraph on page 7 of the opinion, the last sentence and accompanying citation are amended to read: An order for restitution is one compelling a UCL defendant to return money obtained through an unfair business practice to those persons in interest from whom the property was taken. (Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc., supra, 23 Cal.4th at pp. 126-127.) This modification does not affect the judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.