In re Destiny D.
Annotate this CaseThe juvenile court possesses the statutory authority to terminate its jurisdiction at disposition in an appropriate case upon releasing the dependent child to a custodial parent. In this case, the Court of Appeal affirmed the juvenile court's declaration that Destiny was a dependent child of the court; decision to release Destiny to the custody of her mother, limiting father to monitored visitation with the child; and termination of its jurisdiction. The court held that the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by terminating its jurisdiction at the disposition hearing. Having dismissed the allegations concerning domestic abuse on the ground the restraining order obtained by mother eliminated any risk of harm, the juvenile court focused on the risks father's alcohol abuse posed for Destiny in connection with father's visitation rights and whether mother's insight into the effects of such alcohol abuse were too recent to adequately protect Destiny from harm. The juvenile court modified the superior court's visitation order to require monitored visitation for father and prohibited mother from serving as the monitor, thereby eliminating those risks and concluded that further supervision was unnecessary.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.