People v. Gray
Annotate this CaseDefendant challenged his commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP). The court held that the version of the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA), Welf. & Inst. Code, 6600 et seq., under which defendant was committed is constitutional. Every published opinion to consider the issue has concluded the applicable version of the SVPA passes constitutional must under the strict scrutiny test and has found McKee II persuasive. The court rejected defendant's claim that McKee II was wrongly decided. Accordingly, the court affirmed the order of commitment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.