Taiheiyo Cement v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Share |
Download as PDF
Loading PDF...
Filed 4/4/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE TAIHEIYO CEMENT U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, B226067 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC422623) v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 13, 2012, and certified for publication be modified as follows: 1. On page 2, the phrase âas well as the legislative history indicating that qualified property was parenthetically referred to as Internal Revenue Code section 1245 property,â in the last sentence of the third full paragraph is deleted. 2. On page 4, the phrase âas well as the legislative history indicating that qualified property was parenthetically referred to as Internal Revenue Code section 1245 property,â in the last sentence of the second full paragraph is deleted. 3. On page 6, the word âqualifiedâ in the last sentence of the first paragraph is deleted and âsection 24356.7â is inserted in its place. 4. On page 15, the words âthe qualifiedâ in the second full sentence of the first paragraph are deleted and âsection 24356.7â is inserted in their place. 5. On page 15, the word âqualifiedâ in the last sentence of the first paragraph is deleted and âsection 24356.7â is inserted in its place. 6. On page 15, the second full paragraph, beginning âFurther, our reviewâ is deleted. This modification does not constitute a change in the judgment. Appellantâs petition for rehearing is denied. ______________________ MALLANO, P. J. _____________________ ROTHSCHILD, J. 2 ____________________ CHANEY, J.