Bonfigli v. Strachan
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 3/24/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOSEPH A. BONFIGLI et al., A125924 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV-239528) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] ALAN F. STRACHAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. BY THE COURT: Respondent s petition for rehearing is denied. The request filed on March 7, 2011 by attorney Deirdre Taber Kingsbury, counsel for appellant Bonfigli, to change 16 parts of this court's February 23, 2011 opinion is denied as to parts 1 through 15, but is granted as to part 16. This court's said February 23rd opinion is modified to add the word "not" to the second sentence of the first full paragraph on page 15 to read: "The jury, however, was erroneously instructed; hence, we cannot conclude that it would not have found fraud on the evidence before it or that the jury would not ¦." There is no change in the judgment. (Ruvolo, P. J., Reardon, J., and Rivera, J. joined in the decision.) Date:________________________ ________________________________P.J.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
