Sanson v. State

Annotate this Case
James S. SANSON v. STATE of Arkansas

CR 96-620                                          ___ S.W.2d ___

                    Supreme Court of Arkansas
                 Opinion delivered June 10, 1996


Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for 
     granting. -- An admission by the attorney for a criminal
     defendant that the failure to file the record in time was due
     to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for
     rule on the clerk.


     Paul A. Schmidt, for appellant.
     No response.

     Per Curiam.June 10, 1996   *ADVREP*SC7*





JAMES S. SANSON,
                    APPELLANT,

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS,
                    APPELLEE.



CR96-620


MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK





MOTION GRANTED




                           PER CURIAM

     Petitioner, James S. Sanson, by his attorney, Paul A. Schmidt,
has filed a motion for rule on the clerk.  His attorney admits that
the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.  
     We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for
a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion.  See
Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re:  Belated
Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).
     A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee
on Professional Conduct.  In Re:  Belated Appeals in Criminal
Cases, 265 Ark. 964. 
     DUDLEY, J., not participating.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.