Sanson v. State
Annotate this CaseJames S. SANSON v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-620 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 10, 1996 Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for granting. -- An admission by the attorney for a criminal defendant that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk. Paul A. Schmidt, for appellant. No response. Per Curiam.June 10, 1996 *ADVREP*SC7* JAMES S. SANSON, APPELLANT, V. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE. CR96-620 MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK MOTION GRANTED PER CURIAM Petitioner, James S. Sanson, by his attorney, Paul A. Schmidt, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. DUDLEY, J., not participating.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.