McCoy v. State
Annotate this CaseLeroy King McCOY v. STATE of Arkansas CR 96-514 ___ S.W.2d ___ Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 20, 1996 Appeal & error -- motion for rule on clerk -- good cause for granting. -- An admission by the attorney for a criminal defendant that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted. R. Brent Crews, for appellant. No response. Per Curiam.05-20-96 CR96-514 LEROY KING MCCOY, APPELLANT, MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK. V. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE, GRANTED. Per Curiam. The appellant, Leroy King McCoy, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, R. Brent Crews, filed a timely notice of appeal. While appellant apparently retained another attorney, Mr. Crews failed to ask to be relieved as counsel. He admits that he was required to do so, see Young v. State, 318 Ark. 235, 884 S.W.2d 591 (1994), and that the failure to timely file the record was due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Dudley, J., not participating.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.